Wednesday, 29 February 2012
An overview on what happened and why by Forbes
The American business report on the night of Black Monday
Investment Advisor Kenneth W. Brown predicting the crash months before it happened
Saturday, 25 February 2012
The many theories and causes of the crash
Program trading by institutional investing companies was a cause of the crash.
However other markets such as Australia and Hong Kong, where program trading was not widespread, also crashed. These may have been in reaction to the program trading in the U.S. but economist Richard Roll says that the crash began in Hong Kong and struck the U.S. after other markets had already descended by considerable amounts.
A senior fellow
with the National Centre for Policy Analysis of Dallas and the Brady Commission
argued that the early blames for the crash was to do with the failure between
the stock markets and derivatives markets to activate in sync with each other.
This can happen as the options and futures rely heavily on the changes and
volatilities in the stock prices market.
Illiquidity played its part during the crash as large amounts of sell orders were trying to be processed it was difficult to find buyers and this led to termination in trading for many listed stocks. This heightened the price drop as investors had overestimated the amount of liquidity. It does not explain why so many people tried to sell so much stock at the same time. This could be to do with human nature and panic settling in the market
Analysts concur that the stock prices were overvalued around the time of the crash with Price/Earning and Price/Dividend ratios being too high. Though this does not explain the trigger of the crash as they were also historically high in the period 1960-1972 and no crash occurred then.
A reason for investors leaving the stock market could of been to do with the
growing attraction of the bond market as long term bond yields had started the
year at 7.6% and had grown to 10% by the summer. This offered a more stable,
lucrative alternative to the stock markets for investors.
Another possible reason was the announcement on
October 14th of the large U.S. trade deficit where investors
may have predicted a fall in the dollar on foreign
exchange markets. However this does not explain crashes in other countries.
With these arguments still in contention for debate, program trading
took a lot of the blame in the public eye and next week I will discuss the
aftermath and the Government intervention that followed the crash.
Saturday, 18 February 2012
Origins
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, SEC,
that had been set up after the great depression
had worked effectively at preventing crashes and fraudulent practices
throughout the stock market and had even convinced cautious investors back into
the markets in the 1960s and 70s. The problems were they could lead the horse
to water but couldn’t make it drink i.e. they could bring the investors to all
the information about companies but couldn’t make them invest in the best ones.
Investors could be easily persuaded by
the public image of a company and not the value. The SEC tried to prevent this
by making all companies announce what assets they had if any but investors
would believe that these companies had limitless potential and so consistently
backed them. This continued into the 80s even though there were regular bumps
and insolvencies, where companies did not reach their financial goals and
expectations. Conglomerates and hostile takeovers were popular in this “new
economy” and it was said that companies “would grow exponentially rather than
incrementally simply by picking up other companies”.
The market kept rising through the 80s
and SEC were unable to stop these conglomerates and there became a huge dependence
on program trading, which is computerised trading set to occur when index
prices rise or fall to a certain level which can create very volatile
situations.
At the start of 1987, the SEC started
investigations into insider trading, news of which began to unnerve investors,
even though some investors may have been aware of this insider trading.
Bonds or even junk bonds became a more attractive
proposal than the corruption being publicised in the stock markets. This led to
a huge departure from the market and the program trades began to take control
with their stop loss features being activated. These were settings that would
automatically sell stocks if their prices fell to a certain level. With a vast
number of stop loss features sending orders to the NYSE computer (designed
order turnaround, DOT) it made the system freeze and lag. This left every
investor effectively blind. Then panic set in with more and more people selling
stock even though they were unaware of what losses were made and if the order
would happen quick enough to keep up with falling prices.
The New York Times, above, sums it up well what happened as it led the Dow Jones to fall by 508.32 points which
was 22.6% and $500 billion disappeared.
In my next posts I’ll discuss the different causes
and what Government intervention was taken to stop history repeating itself.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)